Critique of Urban Geography (Debord)

It has long been said that the desert is monotheistic. Is it illogical or devoid of interest to observe that the district in Paris between Place de la Contrescarpe and Rue de l’Arbalète conduces rather to atheism, to oblivion and to the disorientation of habitual reflexes?

via Critique of Urban Geography (Debord).

Like this:

Be the first to like this post.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 14th, 2009 at 5:22 PM and is filed under COMM 563, Journal. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

	Twitter Tips: for Te… on Twitter: A Tool for Academia t…
	AnnaMarie Barquest on ‘Hyperlocal’ Web Sites Deliver…
	Kevin barquest on Does Social Media Make Us Bett…
	AnnaMarie Barquest on COMM 563 reading review t…
	Kevin Barquest on COMM 563 reading review t…

Organizational Leadership Journal